Stevens  County Washington Answer To JUST SAY NO TO
HR-5101 Stealth Taking of Property Using Wildlife Corridors

Hello Jack!

I couldn't
agree with you more!!  What is even more on the scary side of this article
is the fact that the Security and Prosperity Partnership that Bush signed in
March of 2005 with Canada and Mexico could have been the actual beginning
of the North American Union(NAU).  To think that
here we are- only 5 short years later- looking at regional commonalities that
stretch across the Canadian borders to "unite" us in the
eco-governance is really disturbing to me. I suppose that its no surprise that we refuse to enforce the
southern border as well.  Furthermore, I have noticed one heck of a lot of
references to our country- the USA- being referred to as North America.  I
don't know if that offends you or not, but it sure does offend me.  At no
time in my life will I ever be a North American citizen or a global citizen or
a New World Order citizen.  I am an American...period.  If they are
going to call me anything else, I would like to take that up with whoever
thinks they are in charge.

However much I am revolted by an
NAU, the European Union(EU) had the same takeover
happen to them.  What they thought was just a free trade agreement, turned
out to be the initial steps of a unionization of their whole continent, for the
most part.  That happened in 1972.  What I found odd about the year
is that 1972 was the same year that UN took ownership of most of our National
Parks through the United Nations' World Heritage Treaty.

The problem is clearly the UN on US
soil.  What we're doing about it is something that has already been
accomplished almost single-handedly by just one lady in Grant County OR.
She called a Congressional Hearing by getting 250 signatures.  They voted
the UN out of their county 10 years ago.  To this day, the Sheriff refuses
access to any UN official or delegate and they are unable to step foot in the
county.

So, having met this lady in person
and talked at length with her about this, we have written a County Resolution
that we will be submitting to our own County Commissioners this month.  If
they pass it, we can refuse UN access in this county as well, and therefore,
refuse UN programs in the future, such as all Sustainable
Development governance like Smart Growth, Growth Management, Comprehensive
Planning, and the Wildlands Project.

I would like to see all the other
counties in WA sneak this one through as well.  It can be accomplished
fairly low-key, if it is planned correctly.  he
fewer greenies to catch onto the plan, the better.  If this could catch on
nation-wide, we could have a chance at refusing this garbage from the EPA, DOE,
etc, etc.  Of course my HB/SB that I have written to limit the agencies addresses that
as well, and that is also a necessary step to throw them off our trail.

If you would like a copy of our County
Resolution, just let me know and I can forward it to you.  It may be
easier than you think..........  ;)

Sincerely,

Rene' Holaday

www.ElectReneHoladay.com

--- On Sun, 7/4/10, John (Jack) R. Venrick <[email-masked]>
wrote:

From: John (Jack) R. Venrick <[email-masked]>

Subject: JUST SAY NO TO HR-5101 Protecting wildlife will require collaboration,Western governors told

To: [email-masked]

Date: Sunday, July 4, 2010, 9:25 AM

To: Montana & Washington State
House and Senate, Washington State Supreme Court, Property Rights Groups,
Evergreen Freedom Foundation, Mountain States Legal, Pacific Legal Foundation,
Institute of Justice, Friends, Natural Resource Defense Council, MSU, Media
Puget Sound & Missoulian

Let me count the reasons to say NO
to HR-5101 and to ALL green extreme out of state "wildlife
corridors".  This is a national and global takeover of our
public and private land for out of state and international interests
and benefits.  This has little to do with saving the species and much more
to do with destroying local access and control to YOUR private and public
lands.  Just follow the money and the causes.

This is the same OLE gangrene
shell game where the states and their municipal corporations and green
global groups steal as much as they can get away with, before
the locals wake up.  Then it's too late and another reason for another revolution.
There are some 76 green sue happy groups in Missoula, home to University of
Montana and the Regional U.S. Forest Service Headquarters and probably many in
Bozeman home to MSU.  This is no accident.  Green takings are steeped
in agenda junk debased "science" NOT true and honest independent
science.

Wake up Montana before your
traditions and property rights are completely destroyed as they have been
in the State of Washington and Puget Sound.  These green corridors are
a deadly terminal cancer which will eat you inside out and you won't
even know it until it is too late.  The crooks in government will broker
off your private and public land without any authority, jurisdiction or your
approval and it will be sold all for your best good using the "best
available science" grant money can buy off.

If you want to drive away
business and jobs and further hollow out your once allodial rights into
Swiss cheese titles and continue to collapse your economy, this is
definitely the way to go.  It gets worse.  If you think someone
else will save you, think again.  All property takings connect
to these same government and nongovernment groups who are taking over your
property for power and profit.  Everyone but the property owners
profit directly or indirectly from these takings.  Property is not unlike
the fiat unFederal unReserve notes in your pocket.  The value of property
and currency or lack of,  go hand and hand.
They are both relatively worthless as they are eroded by increasing debt,
"subject to" obligations, liens, taxes, codes, fees, easements,
eminent domain, green nonsense conditions, mineral rights taking, permits,
licenses, conditional regulations, zoning and usury interest. All of which
are nonsense de facto, colored and debased hollow laws which go against the
Laws of Nature and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the
action, intent and success of the American Revolution.

The constitutional conventions and
their constitutions have been cooked by the same parties who are cooking up all
these green myths. There never was separation of power. There was
ONLY massive centralization of power.  This is no accident
either.

Here is a short list of links to a
long list of green man caused hoaxes used to confiscated private and public
property all for your own good of course.

1. http://www.takingliberty.us/

2.  http://www.freedomforallseasons.org/FreedomFromEndangeredSpeciesMythomania.asp

3.  http://www.freedomforallseasons.org/FreedomFromRuralCleansingNew.dwt.asp

4.  http://www.freedomforallseasons.org/EmbattledPropertyOwnerStoriesNew.asp

5.  http://www.freedomforallseasons.org/FreedomFromManCausedGlobalWarmingMyths.dwt.asp

6.  http://www.freedomforallseasons.org/FreedomFromEndangeredSpeciesMythomania.asp

Wake up Montana before you become
another terminal green cancer victim like the State of Washington.

Jack Venrick

Enumclaw, Washington

www.freedomforallseasons.org

http://www.freedomforallseasons.org/EmbattledPropertyOwnerStoriesNew.asp/news/state-and-regional/article_b7e2c36a-833c-11df-84b3-001cc4c002e0.html

This article underscores what we are seeing
coming down the pike in terms of the provisions of HR-5101, the wildlife
corridors bill that leads to the formal establishment of the continental-scale
corridor-buffer programs.  Added highlighting points to
some of the more important points.

Protecting wildlife will
require collaboration, Western governors told

By MICHAEL JAMISON of
the Missoulian | Posted: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:30
pm | 1 Comment

WHITEFISH - No park is an island.

That was the message from Whitefish, where
governors from Western states met early this week to discuss, among other
things, how to protect wildlife and ecosystems
that span jurisdictional boundaries.

Montana shares borders with Idaho, and with
Wyoming and the Dakotas and with two Canadian provinces, "and wildlife, water and air don't declare allegiance to
any of those borders," said Sally Jewell.

Jewell is president and CEO of the outdoor
recreation giant REI, and was among the panelists advising the governors on
Monday. She borrowed a quote from the naturalist John Muir to help make her
point that islands of protected wildland are only as strong as the corridors that link them
- "tug on anything at all, and you'll find it connected to everything else
in the universe."

Idaho's wolves are connected to Montana's
tourist economy. British Columbia's land-use decisions are connected to
Montana's water quality, which is connected to its fishery, which is connected,
again, to its economy.

Up in Glacier National Park, land managers share
a border with Alberta's Waterton Lakes National Park.
And according to Glacier Superintendent Chas Cartwright, they also share transboundary
firefighting duties, and international weed control, and migratory wildlife, and rivers and streams and
climate change.

The coordinated
approach to blurring boundaries is "a great model that we all can
learn from," said Waterton Superintendent Dave
McDonough, adding that "the link between the parks is quite
seamless."

***

The challenge for state leaders, said Idaho wildlife professor Michael Scott, is to protect
landscapes large enough to be ecologically significant while at the same
time keeping those lands economically viable. The task will require transboundary partnerships, he said, because local solutions fail in a world of global problems.

Within this century, he said, the country's
population is expected to balloon to half a billion - and managing for wildlife
will be a tremendous challenge in that world.

Scott, who also is a research scientist with the
U.S. Geological Survey, recommends finding ways to generate public support for wild corridors. Large landowners
will be necessary partners with government, he said, because "this is a
changing landscape; it's moving from ‘wildlife friendly' to
‘wildlife challenged.' "

Down in Colorado
and New Mexico, the governors already have signed an agreement creating
corridors for elk along their shared border. Canada and the Pacific states have joined in a collaborative effort to
protect their shared ocean. Up in Montana and British Columbia, leaders
have crafted plans to protect the transboundary wilds around Glacier and Waterton
national parks. (See related story.)

Future agreements must focus on the best habitat, Scott said, rather than on the high mountain scenery usually associated with
protected places.

"We have done a heck of a job protecting
rocks and ice," Scott said, but in the process have
left our parks isolated - too small and too fragmented to sustain natural
systems. Reconnecting them will take time, he cautioned, noting that habitat
loss is almost immediate, while restoration often requires years.

Currently, most state fish and wildlife agencies
are funded by hunters and anglers, and yet sportsman numbers are in decline
relative to the increasing number of people who call themselves "wildlife
watchers." A big part of tomorrow's conservation landscape, then, will
involve engaging those non-hunters in helping
to fund wildlife initiatives, Scott said.

***

How to do that, Cartwright said, "is the question of the
day," especially at a time when even his own grandkids are drawn more to
video games than to outdoor pursuits.

In Waterton, and
across Parks Canada, a new emphasis is emerging to reach out to urban populations, creating a constituency willing to
support conservation efforts that go well
beyond park boundaries.

"Wildlife need a
place to go," agreed Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer. If we'd known then
what we know now, back when we were building the West, he said, "we
would've changed everything."

Now, however, we're left with the work of stitching together the far-flung pieces.

"We can make some changes," Schweitzer
said, "to the way we build things in the future."

___________________________________________